Pengaruh Ekspetasi, Instrumentalitas, dan Nilai Terhadap Penggunaan Transportasi Umum di Kota Surabaya

Authors

  • Graceshiva Sarrani Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Yusuf Hariyoko Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Wahid Hidayat Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/pmr.v5i1.95

Keywords:

Expectancy, Instrumentality, Valence, Public Transportation

Abstract

Traffic congestion in Surabaya City has continued to increase due to the growth of private vehicle ownership, prompting the government to develop public transportation as an alternative mode of mobility for the community. The use of public transportation is influenced not only by service availability but also by users’ motivational factors. This study aims to analyze the effects of expectancy, instrumentality, and valence on public transportation usage in Surabaya City. The research employed a quantitative method with a survey approach involving 384 respondents who were users of Surabaya Bus and WiraWiri services, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed through multiple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS software. The results indicate that expectancy has a significant effect on public transportation usage, and instrumentality also has a significant effect, while valence does not have a significant effect on public transportation usage. Simultaneously, expectancy, instrumentality, and valence have a significant effect on public transportation usage. The study concludes that public expectations regarding service quality and the tangible benefits gained from using public transportation are important factors that encourage the use of public transportation in Surabaya City. These factors can help reduce dependence on private vehicles and contribute to alleviating traffic congestion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, F., Khairina, E., & Dompak, T. (2025). STRATEGI OPTIMALISASI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PELAYANAN TRANSPORTASI UMUM. Jurnal Progress Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.37090/jpap.v5i1.2153

Elaine, M. (2025, December 30). Pemkot Surabaya Akan Berhentikan Driver-Helper Suroboyo Bus dan Feeder yang Ugal-Ugalan. Https://Www.Suarasurabaya.Net/.

Halimah, A. N. (2025, December 30). Beda Nasib Transum di Malam Tahun Baru: Jakarta Layani hingga Subuh, Surabaya Tutup Senja. Https://Www.Netralnews.Com/.

Iba, Z., & Wardhana, A. (2024). OPERASIONALISASI VARIABEL, SKALA PENGUKURAN & INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF (M. Pradana, Ed.). PENERBIT CV. EUREKA MEDIA AKSARA.

Kamaruddin, I., Firmansah, D., Zulifiki, Amane, A. P. O., Nasarudin, Samad, M. A., & Haerudin. (2022). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF (D. P. Sari, Ed.). PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI. www.globaleksekutifteknologi.co.id

Mashkina, N. A., Belyaeva, E. S., Obukhova, A. S., & Belyaeva, O. V. (2021). Digitalization of The Transport Industry in The Context of Globalization of The World Economy. SHS Web of Conferences, 92, 05020. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219205020

Rahmatullah, A. R., Dewi, D. I. K., & Nurmasari, C. D. T. (2022). INTEGRASI ANTAR TRANSPORTASI UMUM DI KOTA SEMARANG. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 10(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.10.1.36-46

Redaksi, T. (2024, August 1). Penumpang Feeder WiraWiri Terus Bertambah, Dishub Surabaya Segera Tambah Rute di Akhir 2024.

Rencana Kerja Perubahan Dinas Perhubungan Kota Surabaya 2024 (p. 36). (2024).

Rossadi, L. N., & Widayati, E. (2024). Pengaruh Aksesibilitas, Amenitas, Dan Atraksi Wisata Terhadap Minat Kunjungan Wisatawan Ke Wahana Air Balong Waterpark Bantul Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Journal of Tourism and Economic, 1(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.36594/jtec/cwkvga87

Salman, G., & Krisiandi. (2023, March 2). Mulai Kamis Ini, Surabaya Operasikan Angkutan “Feeder” Wirawiri Suroboyo, Ber-AC dan “Cashless” . Kompas.Com.

Septanto, H. (2022). PENTINGNYA IMPLEMENTASI SMART MOBILITY SEBUAH SISTEM TRANSPORTASI MODERN PADA SMART CITY. In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi STI&K (SeNTIK) (Vol. 6, Number 1).

Setiawan, A. D., & Hartik, A. (2025, February 19). Surabaya Macet, Dishub Akui Tranportasi Umum Masih Kurang. Kompas.Com.

Stjernborg, V., & Levin, L. (2025). Public transport governance and working conditions of bus drivers: perspectives on accessibility for all in public transport. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 22, 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101607

Suryobuwono, A. A., Raga, P., Nugroho, A., Tampubolon, I. A., Basalamah, Z. A. R., & Irenita, N. (2021). Analisis Prioritas Pengembangan Moda Transportasi Umum Di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Sistem Transportasi & Logistik, 1(2). https://journal.itltrisakti.ac.id/index.php/jstl

Tuan, V. A., Van Truong, N., Tetsuo, S., & An, N. N. (2022). Public transport service quality: Policy prioritization strategy in the importance-performance analysis and the three-factor theory frameworks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 166, 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.006

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. (n.d.).

Yonatan, A. Z. (2024, October 12). Kenapa Kendaraan Pribadi Lebih Digemari Dibanding Transportasi Umum? Https://Goodstats.Id.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-21

How to Cite

Graceshiva Sarrani, Yusuf Hariyoko, & Wahid Hidayat. (2026). Pengaruh Ekspetasi, Instrumentalitas, dan Nilai Terhadap Penggunaan Transportasi Umum di Kota Surabaya. Policy and Maritime Review, 5(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.30649/pmr.v5i1.95

Issue

Section

Articles