Perbandingan Indonesia dan Nepal Dalam Kondisi Geografis, Distribusi Layanan Publik dan Perkembangan Infrastruktur

Authors

  • Bagus Prasetiyono Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Galih Putra Kusuma Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Allena Jasmine Putri Huda Universitas Hang Tuah
  • Moh. Musleh Universitas Hang Tuah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/pmr.v4i2.94

Keywords:

public service distribution, , infrastructure development, geography, Indonesia, Nepal

Abstract

Indonesia and Nepal are developing countries in Asia with contrasting geographical characteristics that influence infrastructure development and public service distribution. Indonesia is an archipelagic country with vast maritime areas and dispersed islands, while Nepal is a landlocked mountainous country dominated by the Himalayan region. These geographical differences create distinct challenges in ensuring equitable infrastructure development and public service delivery. This study aims to analyze the relationship between geographical conditions, infrastructure development, and public service distribution in Indonesia and Nepal through a comparative literature review. The study employs the perspective of territorial governance, which emphasizes that public policies and infrastructure strategies should be adapted to regional spatial characteristics, demographic conditions, natural resources, and disaster risks. Data were collected from academic literature, international reports, and previous studies concerning infrastructure development and public service governance in both countries. The findings indicate that geographical conditions significantly affect infrastructure accessibility and the distribution of public services. In Indonesia, the archipelagic structure increases transportation and connectivity costs across islands, while in Nepal, mountainous terrain constrains road construction and regional accessibility. Both countries have implemented decentralized governance approaches to address these challenges, supported by local government initiatives and development partners. However, disparities in service accessibility remain evident, particularly in remote and geographically isolated areas. This study concludes that geography is a critical determinant of infrastructure development and public service distribution. Effective territorial governance, adaptive infrastructure planning, and geographically sensitive public policies are essential to reducing regional disparities and improving public service accessibility in developing countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, K. K. (2018). Local governance restructuring in Nepal: From government to governmentality. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 12, 37–47.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2025). Statistik Indonesia 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bappenas (Kementerian PPN/Bappenas). (2023). Ringkasan rencana kerja pemerintah tahun 2023: Peningkatan produktivitas untuk transformasi ekonomi yang inklusif dan berkelanjutan. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Bappenas (Kementerian PPN/Bappenas). (2023). RPJMN 2020–2024: Ringkasan rencana kerja pemerintah tahun 2023 – Laporan ketahanan dan infrastruktur. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.

Construction Nepal. (2025, April 15). Nepal’s major construction projects in 2025: Driving development across the nation. https://constructionnepal.com/2025/04/15/nepals-major-construction-projects-in-2025-driving-development-across-the-nation/

Indonesia.go.id. (n.d.). Indonesia di jalan menuju SDGs 2030. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/8618/indonesia-di-jalan-menuju-sdgs-2030-

Industri konstruksi.com. (2025). Infrastruktur 2026: Lompatan strategis PUPR untuk ketahanan nasional. https://industrikonstruksi.com/infrastruktur-2026-lompatan-strategis-pupr-untuk-ketahanan-nasional/

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2024). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2024. Geneva: ITU Publications.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Jablonovski, G. (2025). Sustainable development report 2025: Financing sustainable development to 2030 and mid-century. Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) / University Press.

Shrestha, B., & Pandey, R. (2020). Transport infrastructure and accessibility in Nepal: Challenges and policy options. Journal of Mountain Studies, 12(2), 45–63.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Territorial Governance Frameworks for Inclusive Public Services. Geneva: UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2025). Human development report 2025. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-develohttps://dataindonesia.id/pment-report-2025

World Atlas. (n.d.). Geography and country profiles. https://www.worldatlas.com/

World Bank. (2024). World development indicators: Access to safe water. https://data.worldbank.org/

World Data Lab. (2025). Sustainable development report 2025. https://sdgtransformationcenter.org/reports/sustainable-development-report-2025

Data Indonesia id(2023): Kumpulan Data Fasilitas Kesehatan di Indonesia 5 Tahun Terakhir hingga 2023 https://dataindonesia.id/

Public Health Concern Nepal (PHC-Nepal) : 20 major Health Indicator of Nepal You Need TO Know https://phcnepal.com/

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Prasetiyono, B., Galih Putra Kusuma, Allena Jasmine Putri Huda, & Moh. Musleh. (2025). Perbandingan Indonesia dan Nepal Dalam Kondisi Geografis, Distribusi Layanan Publik dan Perkembangan Infrastruktur. Policy and Maritime Review, 4(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.30649/pmr.v4i2.94

Issue

Section

Articles